Ouellet-Plamondon
investigated the effect of artificial root zone aeration on removal performance
in HSSFCWs (Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands, Fig.1) treating a
reconstituted trout farm effluent 5. Mesocosm experiments were conducted
in a greenhouse, with a combination of planted, unplanted, aerated, and
non-aerated beds. Adding an air diffuser at the front end of the bed would
favor aerobic processes of organic matter oxidation and nitrification, while
the remaining part of the beds could still offer conditions favorable to
denitrification and the gain of artificial aeration would be greater in winter,
when plants are dormant.
Under the experimental
conditions, treatment performances in planted units were generally higher than
in unplanted ones, even in winter, but no differences between common reed and
cattail. Artificial aeration improved organic matter and nitrogen removal,
especially in winter, where it apparently stimulated heterotrophic bacterial
activity without reducing denitrification. Artificial aeration also slightly
enhanced TSS removal in all beds in winter and summer, probably by physical
action, like maintaining empty space in the head part of the gravel bed. The
high efficiency that under all our treatment conditions (TKN removal rates of
more than 70% for all beds) may have been the result of the relatively low
organic load imposed. Yet, despite the already high removal in no-aerated bed,
the addition of artificial aeration still showed significant improvement. The
results are thus conservative, and under higher organic load conditions, the benefit
of artificial aeration may even be more pronounced. The results suggest that
artificial aeration represents a promising approach to improve removal
efficiency in HSSFCW, especially for fresh water fish farms in cold climate,
where artificial aeration is readily available